0x791E:0x1462:0x7327: X1250 radeon embedded desktop pc
The problems I am seeing are that: 1. Flash performance is very slow (heh) 2. Compiz won't start 3. OpenGL work in Processing is at 4~6 fps Great things: GLXGears is several thousands of frames every 5 seconds Attached is Xorg.0.log, xorg.conf, and output from GLXINFO
On 09/15/2010 02:04 AM, Thomas Winningham wrote:
The problems I am seeing are that:
1. Flash performance is very slow (heh) 2. Compiz won't start 3. OpenGL work in Processing is at 4~6 fps
Great things: GLXGears is several thousands of frames every 5 seconds
Attached is Xorg.0.log, xorg.conf, and output from GLXINFO
Thomas, I'm interested in any response you get here. I have chased x1250 issues in radeonhd for the past year+ and haven't had the time to pursue it to an answer. I'll watch the list and the next time I get a bit of time, I'll pull the latest git and see if I can add anything else. Best I can tell it may be a chipset ID issue for the RS690(whatever) chips. There are chipset/clock differences between the x1200 and x1250, but it looks like some chips don't correctly identify themselves. (I'm not sure what difference that makes to radeonhd, but if that impacts the clock settings, etc.., that may be one of the issues you are dealing with) -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@opensuse.org
2010/10/7 David C. Rankin
On 09/15/2010 02:04 AM, Thomas Winningham wrote:
The problems I am seeing are that:
1. Flash performance is very slow (heh) 2. Compiz won't start 3. OpenGL work in Processing is at 4~6 fps
Great things: GLXGears is several thousands of frames every 5 seconds
Attached is Xorg.0.log, xorg.conf, and output from GLXINFO
Thomas,
I'm interested in any response you get here. I have chased x1250 issues in radeonhd for the past year+ and haven't had the time to pursue it to an answer. I'll watch the list and the next time I get a bit of time, I'll pull the latest git and see if I can add anything else. Best I can tell it may be a chipset ID issue for the RS690(whatever) chips. There are chipset/clock differences between the x1200 and x1250, but it looks like some chips don't correctly identify themselves. (I'm not sure what difference that makes to radeonhd, but if that impacts the clock settings, etc.., that may be one of the issues you are dealing with)
You really should switch to KMS. It's actively developed driver. -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@opensuse.org
On 10/06/2010 11:48 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Thomas,
I'm interested in any response you get here. I have chased x1250 issues in radeonhd for the past year+ and haven't had the time to pursue it to an answer. I'll watch the list and the next time I get a bit of time, I'll pull the latest git and see if I can add anything else. Best I can tell it may be a chipset ID issue for the RS690(whatever) chips. There are chipset/clock differences between the x1200 and x1250, but it looks like some chips don't correctly identify themselves. (I'm not sure what difference that makes to radeonhd, but if that impacts the clock settings, etc.., that may be one of the issues you are dealing with)
You really should switch to KMS. It's actively developed driver.
Rafal, I do use KMS configured on occasion with KMS (early) and also with KMS (late). I'm running Arch Linux. (see http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ATI) To me, I don't see any difference in the basic frame buffer, it acts the same both ways. What benefits are you thinking of? And is this kernel mode setting scheme the same KMS you are talking about? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@opensuse.org
2010/10/21 David C. Rankin
On 10/06/2010 11:48 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Thomas,
I'm interested in any response you get here. I have chased x1250 issues in radeonhd for the past year+ and haven't had the time to pursue it to an answer. I'll watch the list and the next time I get a bit of time, I'll pull the latest git and see if I can add anything else. Best I can tell it may be a chipset ID issue for the RS690(whatever) chips. There are chipset/clock differences between the x1200 and x1250, but it looks like some chips don't correctly identify themselves. (I'm not sure what difference that makes to radeonhd, but if that impacts the clock settings, etc.., that may be one of the issues you are dealing with)
You really should switch to KMS. It's actively developed driver.
Rafal,
I do use KMS configured on occasion with KMS (early) and also with KMS (late). I'm running Arch Linux. (see http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ATI) To me, I don't see any difference in the basic frame buffer, it acts the same both ways.
What benefits are you thinking of? And is this kernel mode setting scheme the same KMS you are talking about?
Really, there are many articles, notes on KMS. It's just wasting time to explain it over and over again what are the advantages of KMS, please Google. -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: radeonhd+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: radeonhd+help@opensuse.org
participants (3)
-
David C. Rankin
-
Rafał Miłecki
-
Thomas Winningham