![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/129c5b7244f2b7b09a1348ad3d488c57.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
4 May
2009
4 May
'09
15:15
On Apr 30, 09 08:11:25 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
I just think /we/ like using int hotx = 0, hoty = 0; over
+ int hotx, hoty; + + hotx = 0; + hoty = 0;
This is a very minor issue. Actually, I think both are reasonable.
Definitely nothing I would debate on whether to include a patch or not.
Thanks
Matthias
--
Matthias Hopf