Hi, python-cepa was on the way to Factory, as it got removed from d:l:p Was that by mistake? Can this be recovered, please? Thanks Axel
Dne 05. 03. 22 v 10:42 Axel Braun napsal(a):
python-cepa was on the way to Factory, as it got removed from d:l:p
Was that by mistake? Can this be recovered, please?
No, it wasn't mistake. I have written to you before (in the comments on the package side, search you email) that the package is not fit to be put into Factory. It conflicts with python-stem (https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:languages:python/python-stem) and it is not clear what is the relation between them. Even if it is a fork of stem, it is their duty not to conflict with the stem's namespace. This conflict must be resolved either by the packager or it should be handled upstream, but we cannot have two packages having the same module name in %{python_sitelib}. Best, Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mcepl@ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. -- Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt
Hello Matěj, Am Sonntag, 6. März 2022, 00:01:12 CET schrieb Matěj Cepl:
Dne 05. 03. 22 v 10:42 Axel Braun napsal(a):
python-cepa was on the way to Factory, as it got removed from d:l:p
Was that by mistake? Can this be recovered, please?
No, it wasn't mistake. I have written to you before (in the comments on the package side, search you email) that the package is not fit to be put into Factory.
You may have written to the packager, but not to me. In https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/957508 there is no comment as well that points into this direction. Addressing it here before you accepted the SR would be the way to go.
It conflicts with python-stem (https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:languages:python/python-stem)
and it is not clear what is the relation between them. Even if it is a fork of stem, it is their duty not to conflict with the stem's namespace. This conflict must be resolved either by the packager or it should be handled upstream, but we cannot have two packages having the same module name in %{python_sitelib}.
These issues should be addressed to the packager and discussed, but in *no way* a package should simply be removed without further comment or discussion. This is rude and not the way we want to work together in the openSUSE community! How do we get the situation fixed? Best, Axel
Dne 06. 03. 22 v 9:03 Axel Braun napsal(a):
These issues should be addressed to the packager and discussed, but in *no way* a package should simply be removed without further comment or discussion. This is rude and not the way we want to work together in the openSUSE community!
I have informed packager (at least I thought I did) and he did nothing, and then for the second time the autorobot send SR to Factory, which failed again, because of the same error. It is a packager's duty to follow up whether the package has been accepted and look after possible errors. Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mcepl@ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8 I am certain there is too much certainty in the world. -- Michael Crichton
Am Sonntag, 6. März 2022, 18:38:02 CET schrieb Matěj Cepl:
Dne 06. 03. 22 v 9:03 Axel Braun napsal(a):
These issues should be addressed to the packager and discussed, but in *no way* a package should simply be removed without further comment or discussion. This is rude and not the way we want to work together in the openSUSE community!
I have informed packager (at least I thought I did) and he did nothing, and then for the second time the autorobot send SR to Factory, which failed again, because of the same error. It is a packager's duty to follow up whether the package has been accepted and look after possible errors.
And how do we solve the issue? https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194866 is currently blocked as cepa does not exist anymore Best Axel
Hi On 3/7/22 20:23, Axel Braun wrote:
Am Sonntag, 6. März 2022, 18:38:02 CET schrieb Matěj Cepl:
Dne 06. 03. 22 v 9:03 Axel Braun napsal(a):
These issues should be addressed to the packager and discussed, but in *no way* a package should simply be removed without further comment or discussion. This is rude and not the way we want to work together in the openSUSE community!
I have informed packager (at least I thought I did) and he did nothing, and then for the second time the autorobot send SR to Factory, which failed again, because of the same error. It is a packager's duty to follow up whether the package has been accepted and look after possible errors.
And how do we solve the issue? https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1194866 is currently blocked as cepa does not exist anymore
Anyone who cares about that bugzilla issue can always create a submit request to cepa resolving the issues so that it can be resubmitted to factory. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
participants (3)
-
Axel Braun -
Matěj Cepl -
Simon Lees