* Johan Dot [02-19-23 16:23]:

Well.. Noticed that chairman didn't wanted to be involved.. From the tread at Users mailing list. Start a new tread here. Regards

re: chairman comment, I don't believe that is quite what he conveyed. perhaps more like he would reserve comment until he had a better understanding of the project. doesn't appear that many outside the project are very well informed about it. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet oftc

On 2023-02-19 22:21, Johan Dot wrote:

Well.. Noticed that chairman didn't wanted to be involved.. From the tread at Users mailing list. Start a new tread here. Regards

Leap is dependant on the SLE codebase in order to exist That SLE codebase is transforming into ALP, or to put a more dramatic spin on it, SLE as we know it is ending. This is an unavoidable fact - it's decisions made by SUSE, for SUSE's buisness, to make SUSE money. Therefore, Leap as we know it, is ending. What comes next is not so set in stone. ALP in the context of openSUSE _COULD_ end up being very close to what SUSE are making commercially and just made available to openSUSE to sprinkle some community additions atop. That would arguably be very close to Leap in terms of how it's made..but not how it's used, which is I guess the crux of your objections. If you want something that would be USED very similar to Leap, you and all the other people like you are going to have to help make it. Like Gerald implied in his post to users@, it's really down to those building/maintaining the distros. If people don't make something that you want, then I'm afraid you're just going to be stuck with what the people who make stuff want to make.