On 07/07/2011 03:52 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
I seriously wonder why you think that beta releases attract more testers -
taking that we had "beta"s before and changed to milestones because people
were supposedly scared away from the term beta. Now you want the term beta
back - but I'm willing to try. The question though is: how do you measure if
it made any difference?
Although I have been an openSUSE and SuSE user since 6.3, I have only been
involved with testing the pre-releases since 11.1, and I only remember the
milestone/rc days. If you accept that a "beta" version is feature-complete and
free of huge bugs, then MS5 or MS6 match those criteria; however, I would be
hard pressed to categorize MS1 or MS2 as alpha.
I'm not sure how the measure the success of this change. The only things that
count are the number and severity of the bugs in the final release. I certainly
want to avoid another case like 11.3 GM where all networking was broken by two
different critical bugs.
I am not trained in psychology, and I'm not sure what will attract testing;
however, I certainly think that the publicity surrounding the release of the
"one-and-only" Beta version will have more news impact than the
Milestones will; however, it is clear that we need to hit other news outlets
than those within the traditional openSUSE family.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org