-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Hello all,
I bet most people do not realize but we happen to have openSUSE.org bugs tracker [1]. This is collecting various infra bugs/feature requests/etc and also consolidates the bugs that are reported if you click on "Report bug" at the OBS. (my take here should be we should remove the button :-])
There also is bunch of bugs assigned to opensuse-communityscreening that is most probably /dev/null (and we already killed it from default asignee) and still need some screening/closing.
Now I can machine parse and close most of those that seem no longer relevant (based on time of activity and type of package/product...). But it makes sense if real interested parties could review it first and pick up anything that seems useful before we unleash "the bot".
Cheers
Tom
[1] https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/buglist.cgi?action=wrap&classificatio n=openSUSE&limit=0&list_id=9332189&order=changeddate%2Cassigned_to%20DE SC%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&product=openSUSE.org&query_format=advanced &resolution=---
Tomas Chvatal wrote:
There also is bunch of bugs assigned to opensuse-communityscreening that is most probably /dev/null (and we already killed it from default asignee) and still need some screening/closing.
Now I can machine parse and close most of those that seem no longer relevant (based on time of activity and type of package/product...). But it makes sense if real interested parties could review it first and pick up anything that seems useful before we unleash "the bot".
opensuse-project is most probably the worst place to announce this - why not opensuse-factory and opensuse-general ?
On 16 April 2018 at 20:59, Per Jessen per@computer.org wrote:
Tomas Chvatal wrote:
There also is bunch of bugs assigned to opensuse-communityscreening that is most probably /dev/null (and we already killed it from default asignee) and still need some screening/closing.
Now I can machine parse and close most of those that seem no longer relevant (based on time of activity and type of package/product...). But it makes sense if real interested parties could review it first and pick up anything that seems useful before we unleash "the bot".
opensuse-project is most probably the worst place to announce this - why not opensuse-factory and opensuse-general ?
Because the openSUSE.org product in bugzilla is precisely related to the topics that are to be discussed in this channel. General project sundries and everything not the distribution development.
opensuse@ is a support mailinglist and irrelevant to all of the parts of the project covered by the openSUSE.org component in bugzilla.
opensuse-factory@ is for distribution development.
Tomas is posting the right topic on the right list
-- Per Jessen, Zürich (12.2°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - free dynamic DNS, made in Switzerland.
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org
Richard Brown wrote:
On 16 April 2018 at 20:59, Per Jessen per@computer.org wrote:
Tomas Chvatal wrote:
There also is bunch of bugs assigned to opensuse-communityscreening that is most probably /dev/null (and we already killed it from default asignee) and still need some screening/closing.
Now I can machine parse and close most of those that seem no longer relevant (based on time of activity and type of package/product...). But it makes sense if real interested parties could review it first and pick up anything that seems useful before we unleash "the bot".
opensuse-project is most probably the worst place to announce this - why not opensuse-factory and opensuse-general ?
Because the openSUSE.org product in bugzilla is precisely related to the topics that are to be discussed in this channel. General project sundries and everything not the distribution development.
opensuse@ is a support mailinglist and irrelevant to all of the parts of the project covered by the openSUSE.org component in bugzilla. opensuse-factory@ is for distribution development.
Tomas is posting the right topic on the right list
I think that is debatable. The authors and assignees of most of those reports are unlikely to be found here, I suspect.
638 bugs
150 for BuildService 370 for 3rd party software 37 for Software Portal 8 for Wiki 31 for Infrastructure 12 for Download Infrastructure 20 for Bugzilla 7 for Documentation 8 for System Imaging 4 for openFATE 6 for OBS Request
I sincerely doubt many of Tomas' "real interested parties" will be subscribed here.
-
Per Jessen -
Richard Brown -
Tomas Chvatal