Hi Brian Am 23.02.2012 19:37, schrieb Bryen M Yunashko:

On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 18:36 +0100, Wolfgang Hahnl wrote:

...

I have read you discussion. There are a lot pros and cons. We have to have all this more simple. And I think I have missed something. So I have to ask some questions (Q) and will give some answers (A). These is my way of thinking:

Sorry but I think you have overly-complicated the topic instead of simplifying it. The question that was posed was what to do about all those members who are no longer actively involved in the community in any way at all. The focus of the question is not how to build and grow the community, but how to resolve what is essentially a membership accounting question. Nothing more, nothing less.

Sorry, objection your honor. I would like to see the whole process. There are a lot of depencies. Please think twice.

And by the way, you reference contribution as "building the greatest distribution."

This is not my idea. Have you seen the source, were I got this? It is on the Main Page in [...]

So please, don't narrow down the definition of contributor to just our distro. That would alienate a number of our existing contributors in a very adverse way, and send a bad message that we only appreciate people who help with the distro and nothing else under the Project umbrella.

I think it is for openSUSE membership? But there are people who have to decide. Not me. These are only my ideas to simplify things and to descibe a pattern. Thanks Slughorn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org