On 06/24/2010 06:45 PM, Peter Czanik wrote:
My understanding is kernel 2.6.32 is meant to be the current LTS type kernel, eg SLE, RedHat, Ubuntu etc as this has LTS from the kernel developers? Does this mean a regression from the newer kernel in 11.3?
RC1 is already out, so I suppose, that the strategy discussion targets 12.0.
The strategy targets project in general, not only distribution. This question is technical, take it to appropriate mailing list (opensuse-kernel@o.o).
I don't know, if it would make sense, but I'd create a three tire system for derivatives: - there would be a core distro, which could be easier to port to other architectures (PPC, ARM) and to maintain long term - major derivatives (KDE, GNOME, special interest applications, etc.) would make a second, larger repository (think of contrib, but being larger than core), so it would be still a coherent system, but parts of it lead by different parts of the community
I think it makes sense and I like it.
- smaller, independent derivatives could stay as OBS projects
-- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol RUSNAK SUSE LINUX, s.r.o openSUSE Boosters Team Lihovarska 1060/12 PGP 0xA6917144 19000 Praha 9 prusnak[at]opensuse.org Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org