On 2024-04-11 10:43, Simon Lees wrote:
Until today in my time of monitoring I hadn't seen any issues even close to worth reporting and or moderating (The one I bought up in this list is an example from memory years back and me guessing based off the reports received). As such I made the truthful and accurate statement that in my time of monitoring the channels I hadn't seen any issues and so that was what the basis of this thread was.
Indeed, so we're back to my salient point You're demonstrating a tendency to trust what you witness for a limited period of time over the views of multiple trusted community members who have witnessed this problem for a much longer period of time. These multiple trusted community members who volunteer to deal with this stuff every day, so the Board don't have to. And based on that limited view that you, individually, established yourself, you (and by proxy the whole Board by backing up you alone) effectively undermined the work our moderators do. Literally, figuratively, and practically establishing yourself as a singular arbiter of what whether or not the Code of Conduct applies, counter to those trusted to do so on a daily basis. "Kick in the teeth" indeed The fact you keep on defending yourself and your right to singularly overrule the concerns of our moderators really shows me you are not understanding my objections here at all. Hopefully this mail finally clears things up for you and you can realise how unacceptable a way of working this is. -- Richard Brown Distributions Architect SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstraße 146, D-90461 Nuremberg, Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Managing Directors/Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich