On Monday 05 October 2015 09:26:34 Andres Betts wrote:
On October 5, 2015 at 9:12:23 AM, Cornelius Schumacher (cschum@suse.de(mailto:cschum@suse.de)) wrote:
On Monday 05 October 2015 08:59:01 Andres Betts wrote:
On October 5, 2015 at 8:46:50 AM, Cornelius Schumacher
(cschum@suse.de(mailto:cschum@suse.de)) wrote:
The "people of openSUSE" actually sounds like a fun side project. I'll see what I can do to get it going again.
Did anyone see what I wrote the other day about this subject?
No, sorry, I'm afraid I missed that. What exactly do you mean?
This is what I wrote.
Oh, I saw that. It's a different topic than the interview series with the "people of openSUSE".
Could maybe a solution to this “inactive member vote” idea be to have a smaller set of decisions made by a smaller group? We all understand that the Board is here “to” help the community but “not to” direct the community. Many of us also think that by voting, we are indeed influencing how the project is managed, when in reality the Board feels that they are not really there to steer the project but to be an aid. That indicates having a passive nature to their involvement.
I don't have a strong opinion on the concrete suggestion, but in general I think it's very reasonable to let trusted people take decisions without the requirement to involve the community at large. This goes well with the "those who do the work decide" mantra. -- Cornelius Schumacher <cschum@suse.de> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org