Le mardi 30 novembre 2010, à 23:24 +0100, Pascal Bleser a écrit :
On 2010-11-30 09:11:04 (-0800), Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
There's been many discussions over the past years about a "rolling update" version of openSUSE on lots of different mailing lists and in person a different conferences. So the time now is to stop talking about it, and actually trying to do it :) [...] So, any thoughts, ideas, objections?
Excellent idea! Just needs to be filled with manpower now ;)
:-) One other thing I'm worried about is that this might result in some contributors focusing on the rolling update, and some others focusing on the "usual" release. Ideally, people would work together, and on both, but that's "ideally", and things will be different. So that literally splits our effort. This of course means something from a manpower perspective, but there's a bigger risk in divergence: code/technical divergence, but also community divergence. On the other hand, I do understand that we probably want something with low overhead when it comes to submitting a change. So how should we do things? Can we require that all changes going in one will go to the other in some way too? Or do we need a model that is similar to Debian's one? To summarize, I don't want people to have to choose between our current way and the rolling release way -- if they do have to choose, they'll just go "oh well, I don't care about the other" and we'll be losing something. Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org