* Vincent Untz <vuntz@opensuse.org> [2012-09-12 08:22]:
Hi,
Le mardi 11 septembre 2012, à 07:46 -0500, Bryen M Yunashko a écrit :
However, my feeling is this:
I don't think it is entirely clear to everyone, except those most closest to the development process, exactly what was the reason (or where things went wrong) for the 12.2 delay.
+1.
If we don't do a post-mortem about 12.2, we'll hit the same issue for 13.1 or 13.2 (unlikely for 12.3, though). So I'd very much prefer to see some analysis of what went wrong, and see how we're going to fix this. I'm pretty sure we can fix the issues, and there has already been some reorganization that will help.
Of course we can discuss the schedule for 12.3, but I don't think we should commit to a schedule before this work is done.
Some of the issues we had I can think of:
- live images were not working for a while - new gcc broke stuff for too long (hi zypp!) - we skipped some milestones (iirc) - coolo had too many fires to deal with by himself
IIRC there were numerous problems caused by the "usr-move" which was largely busywork for no added benefit. And we should probably also add the infrastructure downtimes to this list. -- Guido Berhoerster -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org