On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 12:18 +0100, Dirk Müller wrote:
On Monday 15 December 2008, JP Rosevear wrote:
I agree, I think its odd to make a lengthy 10 month schedule and then not add on 2-4 weeks to grab the final version of GNOME.
final version? GNOME finally ceases to exist? ;)
I don't see the point, there will always be yet-another-release of major software that we'll miss.
well, in this case (Sep 10th) it would just miss GNOME 2.28 by a few days.
I don't understand why a shorter release cycle was dismissed, there was no reason given? How about a release in ~ May, which includes kernel 2.6.28 and gcc 4.4, and then a release around October/November for 11.3?
I like this, at least from the GNOME POV it allows us to even have a .1 release of the current stable GNOME. And yes, it probably is a better idea to drive the releases from foundational aspects of the distro (kernel, compilers, new system daemons, integration of new software, etc) -- Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo@novell.com> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org