-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El 2020-10-22 a las 18:42 +0200, Michal Kubecek escribió:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 01:27:17PM +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 22/10/2020 11.52, Adrien Glauser wrote:
Care to explain in what way my proposal makes a negative impact on the comfort zone of ML people? My understanding of its implications was that it didn't change anything for ML people, while lowering the entry- barrier for non-ML people in a reasonable way.
For instance, I as user hate when somebody says "do not reply on the list, I'm not subscribed and I will not read it." My instant reaction is to not answer at all, or ignore the request and answer on the mail list.
The standard is to reply both to author and the list - or, more precisely, to everyone involved so far, i.e what "group reply" or similar does. Replying _only_ into the list makes sense for huge flames, not for technical discussion.
I don't see the relationship, sorry.
(Yes, I'm aware that the official openSUSE mailing list "netiquette" is, sadly, exactly the opposite of the standard developer mailing list netiquette, I already pointed that out.)
And being so, not respecting the netiquette does cause flame wars. - -- Cheers Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE 15.1 (Legolas)) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHoEARECADoWIQQZEb51mJKK1KpcU/W1MxgcbY1H1QUCX5HLDxwccm9iaW4ubGlz dGFzQHRlbGVmb25pY2EubmV0AAoJELUzGBxtjUfVewYAnR+AAPvACFDU4ofxXxVE lBx6WWyTAJsEwMF6kD8TBbjbImdSFplM9wo5Nw== =QLog -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----