Given the "discussion & support" here, it is hilarious how openSUSE (or SUSE) is missing in these documents referenced by Tim who is driving SymbiFlow and Google SkyWater PDK free shuttle runs for open-source hardware[1]... Adding @Jan Pleskac, who in the end is the consumer of the proposed "products", hopefully with a much wider community in the future... https://github.com/tropicsquare/tassic/discussions/1#discussioncomment-22774... [1] https://github.com/google/skywater-pdk/ On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 6:14 PM Mark Stopka <mstopka@opensuse.org> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 5:45 PM Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
On Sonntag, 20. Dezember 2020 17:03:49 CET Mark Stopka wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 3:11 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com> wrote:
We have ways to do conflict resolution, this isn't it.
Because repeatedly with no reasonable justification rejecting requests for access to a project you are a CO-MAINTAINER, not OWNER is, as well as rejecting update requests for a package that was not touched in 4 years by anybody else without any meaningful justification either.
I gave justification several times. Everyone can submit requests, not just maintainers, so while not being a maintainer you can still contribute.
Maintainers role is curating, and for this you have to know packaging policies. A newcomer should show they are knowing these rules, and this can be done by doing proper SRs.
I asked you nicely to first show your capabilities for maintainership, and instead of doing so you became more and more aggresive.
You asked, and I told you where to look, but you haven't looked, now have you? And again, where have you shown this guidance regarding the Yosys SR? Except for the snort of a 5 y.o. - "There is more to maintenance than just bumping the version.", which openSUSE Packaging guidelines controls are violated, or rather, as you pointed out, it is just a bump in a version, which NEW violations of such controls does the SR that you have rejected introduces?
Stefan
-- Stefan Brüns