![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/28fb60f36a5c05d6e95d00be1c0c257c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Le 08/08/2021 à 14:44, Andreas Artz a écrit :
IMO it's good to have now the openSUSE Doc and getting the things done with migration etc.
Life is progress and openSUSE as well
sure. But there is something I don't understand. forgive me, I probably haven't read all and any piece of text in this thread... we, of course, have the wiki as documentation but we have also SDB; stuff, which is in the wiki but more syntax oriented. And we have many docs that seems like the old SuSE manual, pretty official (and pretty nice). I don't have an example at hand but I'm sure you know what it is. is the present effort wanting to consolidate all this stuff? If so it could be possible * to keep the same license for all the documentation (probably necessary if you want to copy part of one to the other). We had similar problem when building the Linux Documentation Project wiki (I was in charge then) * to *keep* the wiki, simply replacing a wiki page with a link to the new doc if the new one replaces the old one. * to make some script changing *color* (for example) of wiki pages depending of the last modification date. In Linux time, three years is a very long time. Old pages may be still valuable, but it should be very obvious that the page is old. The main (IMHO) problem with the new system is that we don't know how many people are involved and for how long they will. Organizing the doc is a very huge work, if you want proof reading even more. jdd -- http://dodin.org