Le 03/08/2020 à 06:49, Simon Lees a écrit :
Now we feel that we need to disclose some background and provide clarification over how this all started.
I hope it wont start again a flame war (not sure!!) I had question on your post I finally removed not to myself give wood to the fire
1) defer handling a complaint against a community member to the following board meeting (not on the same day), and
2) in case of extremely severe decisions taken, even if undelightful for the person affected, provide transparency to the community about the actions taken, keeping confidentiality as much as possible but not at all cost.
IMHO, this is not enough. We should think of some sort of "arbitration system", to work when the board itself is involved. This is made obvious by the fact that the membership team was asked to act as such (and not that happy to this) I'm absolutely sure than working to *prevent* future problems is much better than again commenting on previous ones on a basis, this arbitration group could be made of *all* former elected board members accepting the task, plus a number to discuss of previous board chairmans, to give a voice to SUSE, giving the fact they may/may not still be SUSE employees jdd -- http://dodin.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org