On 20/05/2020 00.22, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
Am Montag, 18. Mai 2020, 14:34:55 CEST schrieb Simon Lees:
On 5/18/20 8:37 PM, Richard Brown wrote:
On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 14:34 -0700, Fraser_Bell wrote:
Even with issues around email addresses etc I think documenting that 20% of membership must +1 an email to openSUSE project would probably be workable.
I completely disagree with requiring +1 mails to opensuse-project (unless you want to make the board really untouchable by abusing the chilling effect - but then, it's easier to simply drop the 20% rule ;-)
Using a petition with non-public list of signers is the only sane way how the 20% rule can work in the way it's intended, because being afraid of getting punished (in whatever way) for signing the non-confidence vote should never ever be a reason not to sign.
Yes, I agree, you have a point there. I didn't think of it, but chilling effect is real.
Regards,
Christian Boltz
[1] AppArmor WTF moments are the moments when you check your audit.log or use aa-logprof to update your AppArmor profiles, and see that a program wants permissions you'd never expect it needs. As an extreme (and luckily made up) example: if ping would require read access to your home directory, that would qualify ;-)
Oh, yes. I hit it once, but I forget what it was. :-D Didn't seem a security problem, but a "why do they need this? :-o" moment. Glad to know it wasn't only me. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.1 x86_64 at Telcontar)