Le lundi 09 mars 2009, à 09:45 +0100, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
On Monday 09 March 2009 04:22:16 Luis Medinas wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 01:24 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Let's face it: some aspects of how we (= the openSUSE community) have been handling releases have serious room for improvement. On the tools front we have made good progress. Testing and development cycle have a lot of potential still. The proposal Coolo shared is one idea to improve on that front.
Yes i agree we should focus on testing for 11.2 (some of those steps are already done now just provide usuable beta releases and i think we are almost done in this area). My concern is only about this 8 month release cycle (which i agree because we don't have to deliver buggy stuff in the usual 6 month release like fedora and ubuntu) is the fact we have to sometimes let the latest GNOME or KDE out. Other distros are usually shipping those in time and desktops are usually the "face" of the distros. One good rule of OSS, release good and release often because it will be good marketing.
It's still better than right now ;) - and I suggest, let's give this a try for some releases and if it really does not work in the long run, we revisit it...
Nod. I'm not that worried about missing one GNOME or KDE release. We can always offer it in a build service project, or create a re-spinned Live CD if we want (and I think we will want to do this :-)). I mean, we're already doing the work to backport GNOME 2.26 to 11.1, eg. This would be the same thing (admittedly, a bit more difficult, since we'll want to keep the new patches in GNOME:Factory in GNOME:Unstable, but it's worth trying it at least once) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org