Le 28/11/2013 08:46, Stephan Kulow a écrit :
But this means we can't make this a christmas gift list. We have to consider where our skills are and then move.
it's a simple loop: we can do only what we already did... changing goals (eventually) may attract new skills and push some of us to gain new skills - for example, I never used mediawiki before working with openSUSE... that said I'm quite comfortable with the way openSUSE work now, I don't see so much anarchy. Just some major changes (systemd...) should be more... I don't find the right word. when a major change is unevitable (often in linux world), the community should be largely informed, the testers asked to test again, the writers asker to write on it etc. the people in charge of the change can say: "linux kernel is moving this way, we have no choice than following, we need help to make the move as fluent as possible".. you mean? other example: grub2: I was nearly frightenned by the way it was announced, but when I really used it find it very similar to the old one and easy to manage. just an information workflow to adapt.. and, by the way, we could in such situation create a "upgrading team", aimed to help, if some people have a script that is broken by a change, special care should be done to fix this (apparmor/dovecot problem, just now, for example) this is *not* a strategy change, but can change much the strategy acceptance. thanks jdd -- http://www.dodin.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org