Stephan Kulow - 10:30 6.12.13 wrote:
On 06.12.2013 10:27, Michal Hrusecky wrote:
Robert Schweikert - 11:41 5.12.13 wrote:
...
If we go with the multi integration branch model that is being discussed, where/how are we going to find the necessary chaperone's to manage all these staging branches?
As uncle Ben says - with great power comes great responsibility. Anybody can mess around with Factory, but they should also be responsible enough to make sure they don't break other peoples work.
If we end up with 10, 20, you name it staging trees, and we still only have the "factory maintainers" looking over things, how is that any better than the 1 integration branch we have today?
No, everybody should clean up their own mess, factory-maintainers shouldn't act as caring mommy cleaning up everybody who ... creates a mess around them. People should cleanup their own mess.
Now that's unfair to Richard. Introduction a new gcc is not Richard's "own mess". Basically we will have staging projects where we share the load because the goal of having a new gcc in factory is the higher goal than a personal preference.
Yes, I made myself unclear. It is NOT the mess of the guy who submitted the package but his and AND people depending on him. So THEY ALL should work TOGETHER to fix stuff. Not wait for some coolo to come and make everything work together. -- Michal HRUSECKY SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. openSUSE Team Lihovarska 1060/12 PGP 0xFED656F6 19000 Praha 9 mhrusecky[at]suse.cz Czech Republic http://michal.hrusecky.net http://www.suse.cz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org