Hi all, Le lundi 03 juin 2019 à 11:03:02, Richard Brown a écrit :
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 11:00, Marcel Kühlhorn <tux93@opensuse.org> wrote:
On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 08:47 +0000, Tomas Chvatal wrote:
What I would like to see is to have a proper vote in helios (like when we vote for board members) first with 'rename/no rename' and if rename wins then with the various possible names to be selected.
Also given the importance of the first decision it would be nice to have something more than 50% of the votes but to make sure we have more than X of the all electorate voting and (to avoid brainsplit when we could get 50.2% in favor of one option).
+1
A vote for something big like this really should happen
Sure, but it's a lot of work requiring a lot of effort from a lot of volunteers that will likely take a great deal of time over a number of weeks.
And those volunteers need to know their efforts are going to be worth it..so the discussion is more important than just agreeing with the (obvious) requirement to have voting at the end.
So what is your view on the actual topic of renaming the Project?
I feel as well that it can be a great opportunity to let the world know about the important changes going on amongst the project. But of course there will be a lot of technical issues to solve and it will require a *huge* work of communication. What I like to know is if the issues with the trademark can be overcome or not. I do understand that it will be limitating at so point, but what consequences are we to expect ? We must make a clear list of the benefits vs. the threats for the project. -- 'When there is no more room at school, the dumb will walk the Earth.' Sébastien 'sogal' Poher -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org