![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/184f2936f5d39b27534f4dd7c4d15bfb.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Kim Leyendecker wrote:
Am 11.03.2011 20:25, schrieb Refilwe Seete:
Similarly, if we do adopt a date-based system - please avoid seasons for the same reason. "Spring 2011" is ~April 2011 in Germany - but ~September 2011 in South Africa.
Yes, this is the point why 2011.0 and 2011.1 is the better choice like Mandriva. But we´re not Mandriva or Ubuntu or Mint or Fedora or what ever, we´re openSUSE. Maybe it´s better for our "way we are" to stay with the current version scheme
What do you think?
Personally speaking, I like the current scheme, but then I'm a long-time SuSE Linux user. Like Andreas said "openSUSE does not have a major and minor numbering, even if it seems so." So I vote for a running scheme, next version being 12, then 13 etc. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (4.8°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org