On 2023-12-09 20:09, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Douglas DeMaio <ddemaio@opensuse.org> [12-08-23 04:18]:
Perhaps waiting for the results might be wise. Or being there when it's going to be discussed. Perception aren't facts; it's just an opinion/slant on thing with multiple perspectives. Everyone has an opinion and the slant usually comes from ones own point of view. People had an opportunity to participate or comment on the notes. No one submitted the 2005 logo as was mentioned in the article and wiki. Pointing to something after the fact is fine and I'm certain it will work itself out. But words to portray a narrative that is critical about an open process isn't something I agree with. Some people may feel that way, but that doesn't mean others feel same. I certainly don't, and I would like to see a change rather than a narrative that some might view as "stagnation".
And with the trademark aspects, that statement is there for a reason. The phrase "If you don't know, you better ask somebody" isn't just military jargon. Silence on the trademark for the month between the submissions and time to vote isn't being railroaded in my opinion; there was certainly a sufficient amount of time. v/r Doug
how can I vote to keep existing?
This will likely be discussed in tomorrow's community meeting as we did give a feedback loop that was meant to go to https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/artwork@lists.opensuse.org/ or the Marketing telegram group, which has had tons of discussion on these matters. Just not some much with regard to the existing. v/r Doug