I found this FAQ useful: https://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Leap/FAQ/ClosingTheLeapGap I need to read through all this again, maybe a couple times, to see what else is really changing. Package-compatibility is nice, but is the reason for that (vs. common sources) mostly for signed packages from SUSE available for both distros? I presume that's the goal, since otherwise we could just share sources, and in fact maybe we do/will, but sources do not lead to signed packages without private keys signing them once they are built. Aaron Burgemeister Identity / Security / Linux Consultant On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:36 AM Simon Lees <sflees@suse.de> wrote:
On 4/9/20 10:00 PM, Adrian Schröter wrote:
On Donnerstag, 9. April 2020, 14:09:22 CEST wrote Stasiek Michalski:
This does seem like a much more SLE focused than openSUSE Leap focused transition, branded as a positive change for openSUSE, but at least you did not excuse yourself with Coronavirus as did The Qt Company ;)
How do we figure out branding, how do we package things that actually have to differ between SLE and Jump? I do see the last question kind of skipping that point, does that mean the installation-images still will be different to account for different branding? Will the product package differ? Will the branding be figured out based on /etc/os-release?
Nah, branding is done with a different set of packages. openSUSE will definitive have it's own are of additional and also fork packages. The latter ones are the ones we try to minimize though.
To clarify this further branding is more general then just "branding" packages it will also include things like themes (kinda obvious) and patterns (less obvious).
--
Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net
Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org