On 09/18/2012 10:06 AM, Martin Schlander wrote:
Yep. The people arguing for a 12 month release cycle seem to have some questionable assumptions, e.g. that this automatically makes releases much more stable and polished, and that the same number of people will contribute and test under those circumstances.
Personally I'm very much for sticking to the 8 months. 12 months is too darn long for users and developers alike - and 6 months is too short.
I agree. We are already catching heat because 12.2 contains KDE 4.8.x and not 4.9.x. Why do anything to make that sort of situation worse? Just because we had one delayed release is no reason to discard the 8 month cycle. Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org