On Saturday December 4 2010 11:28:26 Pascal Bleser wrote:
On 2010-12-04 11:15:53 (+0100), Pascal Bleser <pascal.bleser@opensuse.org> wrote:
On 2010-12-04 10:46:23 (+0100), Detlef Reichelt <detlef@die-mafia.de> wrote:
Am Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:19:55 +0100
schrieb Pascal Bleser <pascal.bleser@opensuse.org>:
I personally agree that packages that could also be on build.opensuse.org should go there instead of being in the Packman repository but, unfortunately, not everyone in the Packman team agrees.
because i don't want to split my packages in thousand repos on OBS. An example: I stopped building claws-mail on PackMan because it is in Gnome/Apps. After that i get many mails why i don't build it on PM anymore: "it was nice to have that in PM-Repo so it could be installed without add more repos...."
And, furthermore, to reduce duplication of work, we always have the option to move the packages over to build.o.o and _link them on Packman. That way, updates and patches are shared and only done once, but we can still provide the packages in the Packman repository ;)
(but it still consumes build power on our infrastructure and doesn't alleviate the problem of people using Packman for multimedia also getting updates for those)
If that happens then people are "doing it wrong" cause the vendor stickiness prevents that. If they disable the vendor stickiness they have no reason to moan cause it is their own fault, not? regards, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org