Le mardi 04 août 2009, à 09:58 -0300, Druid a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj@novell.com> wrote:
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 14:36:48 Henne Vogelsang wrote:
Hi,
on 08/04/2009 02:12 PM Andreas Jaeger wrote:
My take on this is: openSUSE in general uses the technically best solution - and this contains both features and stability - and where that's not feasible, the most popular solution is used.
If you want to make this decision making process based on objective criteria you have to tell us how you want to measure all this. Stating this is only 2% of the work :)
Do you have a better proposal on what we shall do in similar situations that will come up? People expect that voting works - and I think we have to state where voting will work and where not,
I dont think voting works. Maybe the decision should be made by a technical commitee, or the release manager, or the board, I dont know. But wide vote I dont believe it works at all.
There was this proposal at some point that many people liked: http://en.opensuse.org/User:Jproseve/CoreMaintainerProposal I still think it's the right way forward. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org