Hello,
I answer to incremental update, ok? I assume you were using 10.2 before 10.3. Would it be any harm to you (your system), if instead of upgrading/(re)installing whole 10.3 over 10.2, you did the following (using 10.2 all the time): a) update boot mechanism to boot faster (in June) b) update Yast SM to faster version (in July) c) update regular KMail to KMail Enterprise (...and so on) d) update KDE 3.5.7 to 3.5.8 e) ...
And while doing and testing all that, in each time would they make the new version?
New version of what? OpenSuse? I explained that before the with incremental update "release" would be rather snapshot of the archive.
With what resources they would do what they already do, which is to make a new release and maintain the bugfix/security of previous ***AND*** do backports and tests like that?
Please, do the math. How do you expect it would be easier to handle 10 (KDE, kernel, Gnome, OpenOffice, etc. for example) changes than 1 change (KDE)? I don't get it. Ok, I think there is no point in discussing it further -- it works for other systems, it works (partially) even for opensuse, but... what can I say more :-) have a nice day, bye -- Maciej Pilichowski --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org