On Tuesday 11 Sep 2012 10:55:50 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
On Sunday 09 September 2012 23:55:53 Nelson Marques wrote:
As some are aware I've hammered down MATE (though it still a lot of polishing) for openSUSE; I'm make a small iso with Kiwi and I was planning to call it 'Borderline'. This is a pure openSUSE 12.2 without any changes which defaults to MATE and LightDM. The MATE implementation is upstream (with some tweaks done directly on mate packages so I don't have to follow the road of pain with branding) and
is mainly the same used by openSUSE. In addition this will get: - Armored with all sort of codecs available (gstreamer/ffmpeg and
friends (ex: libdvdcss2));
- Font Rendering through Infinality - Other stuff I might find interesting.
Is openSUSE ok with the usage of 'borderline' for a derivative? Why I ask this is because 'borderline' is a mental disturbance and somehow rare, in a way close to bi-polarity. This is a cool metaphore :) (borderline-project.eu will come soon).
I join Helen in saying the term is OK to use. Cool project, too. Want to do an article or something like that on it?
What happened to following or observing our trademark guidelines (*)? AFAIU any respin, even ones just reshuffling the official openSUSE:* packages, should be debranded to basedonopensuse branding, and anything using packages out of other repos such as what Nelson suggests or the KDE Reloaded respins, should be completely de-trademarked. Will * http://en.opensuse.org/Image:OpenSUSE_Trademark_Guidelines.pdf PS, Jos, please don't set Reply-To: when posting to a mailing list. -- Will Stephenson, openSUSE Board, Booster, KDE Developer SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org