Full neutrality is also an illusion and a fairytale. We all have our viewpoints and perspectives we can't dissociate ourselves from and you can't neutrally judge between two positions without making a, well, judgement call. And eve. "not taking a position" is a position in and on itself (usually one that serves to reinforce whatever the status quo happens to be) It's pointless to ask something that's both unachievable and possibly doesn't even make sense on a concept level, so maybe it would make to specify what exactly you are asking for here. On June 2, 2023 9:30:29 AM GMT+02:00, Peter Czanik <peter@czanik.hu> wrote:
On 6/2/23 00:33, Per Jessen wrote:
I want our moderators to be neutral. However, as the openSUSE community was never even given the opportunity to choose our moderators, I guess neither opinion counts for much.
Yeah, I agree. Full neutrality is important. Once upon a time in the 90`s I joined the technology world, because real-world problems, politics, whatever did not exist within technology projects. No matter of the background (far left, far right, etc.), you could work together on wonderful projects. And that is how SUSE / openSUSE worked for at least two decades (I started using it in 1996 with S.u.S.E. Linux 4.3). Just think of ReiserFS: we kept using it for a long time, as the focus was technology, not how people behaved outside the technology world. I'd prefer to see this level of neutrality again.
Peter