![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/9c06031aaadda145089b2480338feb86.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Dne pondělí 3. srpna 2020 10:19:35 CEST, Richard Brown napsal(a):
On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 08:43 +0200, jdd@dodin.org wrote:
IMHO, this is not enough. We should think of some sort of "arbitration system", to work when the board itself is involved. This is made obvious by the fact that the membership team was asked to act as such (and not that happy to this) I'm absolutely sure than working to *prevent* future problems is much better than again commenting on previous ones on a basis, this arbitration group could be made of *all* former elected board members accepting the task, plus a number to discuss of previous board chairmans, to give a voice to SUSE, giving the fact they may/may not still be SUSE employees jdd
As a former elected Board Member and a former Chairman I want the record to show that I would not volunteer to involve myself in this way. Dealing with the past issue outlined by Simon was traumatic enough an experience for me. As I thought I made clear in my resignation announcement [1], I do not forsee a day where I will voluntarily handle such matters again, even if it would be of help for the community. Sorry, [1] https://rootco.de/2019-08-19-leaving-the-char/
I fully understand Your point, but still I think jdd's proposal has good base. I think we do need some "conciliation" board or so made from old and honorable community members, ehm. :-) Not necessarily from past Board members, IMHO separate voting would be better, so that there is no link with the Board (and no possible conflict of (emotional, ...) interests or so). I suppose there should be not much work for such group (ehm...), so there could be just ~3 people voted for longer time. -- Vojtěch Zeisek https://trapa.cz/ Komunita openSUSE GNU/Linuxu Community of the openSUSE GNU/Linux https://www.opensuse.org/