On 3/1/20 8:22 PM, jdd@dodin.org wrote:
Le 29/02/2020 à 19:27, Stefan Seyfried a écrit :
But if you cannot even step down after being elected without falling victim to a spanish-inquisition like process,
anybody can do so invoking personal unexpected problem. Do you know what was the spanish inquisition?
My main problem was the fact that somebody *just elected* was driven to dismiss without explanation. I feel it a a slash in the face. I know of no election system allowing such thing (and this have nothing to do with the people I voted for - or not voted for)
doesn't "breaching opensuse guiding principle" imply a *public* breach?
To make it clear before I use this as an example this is not what happened in this case (fortunately since i've been on the board I haven't dealt with a case like this), but as an extreme example I would consider sending abusive private emails (or PM's) to another member of the community or other members of the community a breach of our code of conduct, so it doesn't need to necessarily be public.
may be there should be a non public, member reserved mailing list to avoid such discussion becoming public?
We are now at the point of having 500+ members, and while I generally greatly trust most of our community from my perspective once 500 people know its pretty much the same as something being public anyway. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B