Am 11.04.24 um 10:49 schrieb Richard Brown:
You're demonstrating a tendency to trust what you witness for a limited period of time over the views of multiple trusted community members who have witnessed this problem for a much longer period of time.
These multiple trusted community members who volunteer to deal with this stuff every day, so the Board don't have to.
That's all fine and good. But even if we all trust the moderators doing a fine job, I still feel like it is a good idea to have a second, separate entity take a look at the issue. And I could not read Simon saying "there never was an isuse". He clearly stated (quoting from Memory, that's what I remember from my reading the previous thread): "I have been watching this for <time period, i (seife) do not exactly remembering for how long>, and during this time no issues were present, so it seems like the situation is reasonable *right now*". Personally, I think that's OK. -- Stefan Seyfried "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Richard Feynman