El sáb, 11-12-2010 a las 21:41 +0100, Kim Leyendecker escribió:
Well, I think if you really think off "evergreen" it seems to be the best choice. At first, almost everybody knows what an evergreen is and if you just watch the "green" it works fine with the openSUSE identity.
Exactly, it keeps our green identity intacta and the whole nature connotation. There are so many options but stick with one is useful to identify it and meaningful.
kind regards kdl
On 11.12.2010 20:54, Ricardo Chung wrote:
El sáb, 11-12-2010 a las 20:29 +0100, Stephan Kleine escribió:
On Saturday December 11 2010 20:15:33 S.Kemter wrote:
Am Samstag 11 Dezember 2010, 19:49:14 schrieb Stephan Kleine:
On Saturday December 11 2010 13:54:40 Kim Leyendecker wrote:
In the most points, I agree with you. But How shall we name it during the discussion on the Mailing list? How about simply "openSUSE X.Y LTS" or would that be to obvious? would so not the best looks like wee copied simple ubuntu. To openSUSE X.Y is a evergreen version sounds much better. well, how would you then call the next LTS which has to coexist for at least a bit more than just a few months with the current LTS so people can upgrade when they feel comfortable?
In regards to "copying" buntu by calling a LTS LTS I disagree.
What about openSUSE x.x XE stands for openSUSE x.x eXtended Edition ? And not copying none.
-- Kim Leyendecker (kimleyendecker@hotmail.de) Powered by openSUSE 11.3 This mail was composed under Linux
-- Ricardo Chung | openSUSE Linux Ambassador http://en.opensuse.org/User:Amonthoth http://twitter.com/amon0thoth1 http://amon0thoth1.blogspot.com http://www.facebook.com/pages/openSUSE-Panama-Users-Group/326325121542 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org