On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 08:43 +0200, jdd@dodin.org wrote:
IMHO, this is not enough.
We should think of some sort of "arbitration system", to work when the board itself is involved.
This is made obvious by the fact that the membership team was asked to act as such (and not that happy to this)
I'm absolutely sure than working to *prevent* future problems is much better than again commenting on previous ones
on a basis, this arbitration group could be made of *all* former elected board members accepting the task, plus a number to discuss of previous board chairmans, to give a voice to SUSE, giving the fact they may/may not still be SUSE employees
jdd
As a former elected Board Member and a former Chairman I want the record to show that I would not volunteer to involve myself in this way. Dealing with the past issue outlined by Simon was traumatic enough an experience for me. As I thought I made clear in my resignation announcement [1], I do not forsee a day where I will voluntarily handle such matters again, even if it would be of help for the community. Sorry, [1] https://rootco.de/2019-08-19-leaving-the-char/ -- Richard Brown Linux Distribution Engineer - Future Technology Team Phone +4991174053-361 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org