On 12/05/2013 12:08 PM, Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Robert Schweikert <rjschwei@suse.com> wrote:
If we end up with 10, 20, you name it staging trees, and we still only have the "factory maintainers" looking over things, how is that any better than the 1 integration branch we have today?
Ignoring any supposed reduction in workload, it makes Factory a more valuable tool. ie. If the dependency breakage can be kept in staging projects, then factory is more usable and thus is more likely to be used and that means more testing is happening as a simple consequence of it being used.
That's fine, an if it materializes is a great secondary benefit. The primary question that still needs to be answered, where are the chaperones for the "new" staging trees , if we go that route going to come from? If we have staging trees and the same people than the work load goes up. That's not condusive to better anything. Later, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX Tech Lead Public Cloud Architect rjschwei@suse.com rschweik@ca.ibm.com 781-464-8147 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org