jdd wrote:
Le 30/12/2011 21:50, Per Jessen a écrit :
For instance, a change to using plymouth (a alternative bootsplash thingie) is currently being discussed (as an RFC)
did you notice there are now RFC? same for systemd.
this mean user advices are better considered
Hmm, "RFC" is unfortunately a much abused acronym I'm afraid. Far from every poster of an RFC is interested in the actual C's.
ST (if any) can only arbiter from the various point of view. I mean make a recollection of the various point of view and make a synthesis
That's not what I had in mind - the ST should be there to steer, not just to act as an umpire.
In the Linux Documentation Project, as "leader" or (I like better) "coordinator", I do such thing: after the discussion somebody have to say what the discussion gives as result there, it's me.
That is definitely not the role of an ST. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (6.0°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org