make ignoring changes to source-files
Hi List, Well the subject says it all. "Sometimes"[0] make[1] misses that the (c-)sources it should compile have been changed. Quiet a niusance. Has anybody come across that, too? Cheers Michael [0] Unfortunately this behaviour is not reproducable. 8-( [1] make 3.80, gcc 4.02, SuSE 10
Hi List,
Well the subject says it all. "Sometimes"[0] make[1] misses that the (c-)sources it should compile have been changed. Quiet a niusance.
Has anybody come across that, too? The only times I have found that is when the sources might have been on a different system, such as on an NFS volume. Make uses the date stamp. Over
On Monday 26 June 2006 8:01 am, Michael Dominok wrote: the years I have used make(1) it has proven to be very reliable, and sometimes very maddening when I have a complex relationship, subdirectories et. al. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf@blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
participants (2)
-
Jerry Feldman -
Michael Dominok