Has anybody worked with ACE? http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html Opinions? -- Regards, Steven
Quoting Steven T. Hatton <hattons@globalsymmetry.com>:
Has anybody worked with ACE? http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html
Opinions?
IIRC, TAO, a Corba ORB, is built on ACE. I used TAO several years ago on Solaris or SunOS. Its speed was impressive. Never had a problem with it, but didn't beat on it real hard. HTH, Jeffrey
Steven, On Saturday 09 July 2005 04:44, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
Has anybody worked with ACE? http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html
Like Jeffrey, I, too, have worked with TAO. Schmidt's software has a good reputation both for design and implementation quality. On the other hand, I quickly learned to hate CORBA...
... Steven
Randall Schulz
On Saturday 09 July 2005 11:52, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Steven,
On Saturday 09 July 2005 04:44, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
Has anybody worked with ACE? http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html
Like Jeffrey, I, too, have worked with TAO. Schmidt's software has a good reputation both for design and implementation quality.
On the other hand, I quickly learned to hate CORBA...
... Steven
Randall Schulz
So far, I'm a bit disappointed. There are literally hundreds of #MACROS. Errors are handled by return values rather than by exceptions. The concept of RAII seems to be completely missing from at least some of the design. I'm hoping I can overcome my resistance to these features so I can use ACE. I have to say, it possesses all the aspects that kept me away from C++ for a long time. I truly believe C++ could be used much more effectively than this. -- Regards, Steven
participants (3)
-
Jeffrey L. Taylor -
Randall R Schulz -
Steven T. Hatton