28 Mar
2003
28 Mar
'03
09:31
* Steven T. Hatton <hattons@globalsymmetry.com> [Mar 28. 2003 10:27]:
No need. The code is almost identical you yours. The Part I didn't know to do whas "std::". And the "endl" seems to be a thing of the past as well.
std::endl still works fine. You gcc have just become more anal with the namespaces. -- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?" -- A. P. J.