trouble running smc etherpower II (9432TX) under suse 6.4 and 7.1
hello out there, i have lots of trouble trying to use my second eth interface under suse linux, both 6.4 and 7.1. this is concerning my home server (and every other mac i set up with suse linux 'til now) with the following unspectacular config: power mac 8200/120, one 1,2gb scsi hd (apple built in), one 4,5gb scsi hd (/home), 64 megs of ram (ok ok, it's not my g4 with 1gig ;), on board 10mbit eth (=eth0, works fine unless its pretty slow), one smc etherpower 10/100 (9432TX/MP) via the 'epic 100' module. (if i does work after your hints i guess i'll give it a second to manage nfs for my sun machine... ;) this seems to be pretty normal. everything works fine until you try to activate this smc card to work as the eth1 interface -- there's no difference trying device eth0 for the card. restarting the network (to enable eth1=smc) results in a hanging machine which is not only dead on the console, but also doesn't answer pings nor is reachable via telnet. you have to reset the machine. ***my question now is: did anyone successful use this card under (suse) linux?*** i tried to use this card on a power mac with netbsd -- no problem there... because it's a pretty good card, i think ;) tia for your answers and greetz, timo (aka Pansen)
On Mon, Apr 23, Timo Schöler wrote:
one smc etherpower 10/100 (9432TX/MP) via the 'epic 100' module.
(if i does work after your hints i guess i'll give it a second to manage nfs for my sun machine... ;)
this seems to be pretty normal.
everything works fine until you try to activate this smc card to work as the eth1 interface -- there's no difference trying device eth0 for the card.
restarting the network (to enable eth1=smc) results in a hanging machine which is not only dead on the console, but also doesn't answer pings nor is reachable via telnet. you have to reset the machine.
***my question now is: did anyone successful use this card under (suse) linux?***
i tried to use this card on a power mac with netbsd -- no problem there... because it's a pretty good card, i think ;)
What kernel version do you use? I think the driver is not ready for ppc. Can you try the lastest 2.4.5 beta kernel, the epic100 driver was changed on 20. April. Maybe we should contact one of the authors to fix it. Its a good sign that it works with netbsd. http://penguinppc.org/~olaf/beta/k_deflt-2.4.5-0.ppc.rpm Gruss Olaf -- $ man clone BUGS Main feature not yet implemented...
What kernel version do you use? I think the driver is not ready for ppc.
standard-kernel der 7.1er...
Can you try the lastest 2.4.5 beta kernel, the epic100 driver was changed on 20. April. Maybe we should contact one of the authors to fix it. Its a good sign that it works with netbsd.
danke olaf, sobald ich zeit habe, werd' ich mich drum kuemmern (da kommt natuerlich feed back)...
Gruss Olaf
-- msg, Timo No electrons were harmed in the manufacture of this e-mail. ____________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences who needs Windows and Gates?
On Thu, May 10, Timo Schoeler wrote:
What kernel version do you use? I think the driver is not ready for ppc.
standard-kernel der 7.1er...
Mist :)
Can you try the lastest 2.4.5 beta kernel, the epic100 driver was changed on 20. April. Maybe we should contact one of the authors to fix it. Its a good sign that it works with netbsd.
danke olaf, sobald ich zeit habe, werd' ich mich drum kuemmern (da kommt natuerlich feed back)...
linuxppc-dev und Jeff Garzik können da wohl helfen. http://lists.linuxppc.org/ http://lists.linuxppc.org/listarcs/linuxppc-dev/200104/msg00169.html Gruss Olaf -- $ man clone BUGS Main feature not yet implemented...
standard-kernel der 7.1er...
Mist :)
naja -- muss ja meine enttaeuschung ueber den ppc-port beizeiten echt unterdruecken (deswegen *BSD -- grundgeruest, und nun bau mal schoen; diese computerbildlesergerechten installer sind ja echt aetzend[SORRY!])
Can you try the lastest 2.4.5 beta kernel, the epic100 driver was changed on 20. April. Maybe we should contact one of the authors to fix it. Its a good sign that it works with netbsd.
danke olaf, sobald ich zeit habe, werd' ich mich drum kuemmern (da kommt natuerlich feed back)...
linuxppc-dev und Jeff Garzik können da wohl helfen. http://lists.linuxppc.org/
http://lists.linuxppc.org/listarcs/linuxppc-dev/200104/msg00169.html
Gruss Olaf
danke!
participants (3)
-
Olaf Hering
-
Timo Sch=?ISO-8859-1?B?9g==?=ler
-
Timo Schoeler