I was about to update my kernel to the new stable 2.6.0, but notice Jens has added some changes since test11. Is there any reason to suppost the test11 patch wouldn't work? I guess this is just a way of saying 'Can we have a 2.6.0 patch please Peter?' -- Richard A Downing FBCS http://www.freewebs.com/109bean/ Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my address from this message or its header, you agree to these terms.
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Richard A Downing FBCS wrote:
I was about to update my kernel to the new stable 2.6.0, but notice Jens has added some changes since test11. Is there any reason to suppost the test11 patch wouldn't work?
I guess this is just a way of saying 'Can we have a 2.6.0 patch please Peter?'
What about trying ? patching file drivers/ide/ide-cd.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 3215 (offset 4 lines). diff -Nru a/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c b/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c --- a/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c Wed Dec 17 19:00:07 2003 +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c Wed Dec 17 19:00:07 2003 @@ -799,6 +799,10 @@ * sector... If we got here the error is not correctable */ ide_dump_status (drive, "media error (bad sector)", stat); do_end_request = 1; + } else if (sense_key == BLANK_CHECK) { + /* Disk appears blank ?? */ + ide_dump_status (drive, "media error (blank)", stat); + do_end_request = 1; } else if ((err & ~ABRT_ERR) != 0) { /* Go to the default handler for other errors. */ It doesn't seem to break anything. BTW, Jens has released a patch for Mount Rainier. Search for "Mount Rainier in 2.6" on any linux-kernel archives. -- http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:18:57 -0200 (BRST)
Frédéric L. W. Meunier
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Richard A Downing FBCS wrote:
I was about to update my kernel to the new stable 2.6.0, but notice Jens has added some changes since test11. Is there any reason to suppost the test11 patch wouldn't work?
I guess this is just a way of saying 'Can we have a 2.6.0 patch please Peter?'
What about trying ?
Yes, I did that of course. Perhaps you had trouble understanding my posting? As I said, I had ulterior motives in asking on this list. BTW Please don't send me copies of your list postings - AFAIK you have to be a subscriber to post here. -- Richard A Downing FBCS http://www.freewebs.com/109bean/ Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my address from this message or its header, you agree to these terms. -- Richard A Downing FBCS http://www.freewebs.com/109bean/ Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my address from this message or its header, you agree to these terms.
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Richard A Downing FBCS wrote:
I was about to update my kernel to the new stable 2.6.0, but notice Jens has added some changes since test11. Is there any reason to suppost the test11 patch wouldn't work?
No, the test11 patch should work just as well with 2.6.0 as it did with 2.6.0-test11. That doesn't necessarily mean it will work on either kernel unfortunately. See: http://lists.suse.com/archive/packet-writing/2003-Dec/0009.html -- Peter Osterlund - petero2@telia.com http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 21:53:27 +0100 (CET)
Peter Osterlund
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Richard A Downing FBCS wrote:
I was about to update my kernel to the new stable 2.6.0, but notice Jens has added some changes since test11. Is there any reason to suppost the test11 patch wouldn't work?
No, the test11 patch should work just as well with 2.6.0 as it did with 2.6.0-test11. That doesn't necessarily mean it will work on either kernel unfortunately. See:
http://lists.suse.com/archive/packet-writing/2003-Dec/0009.html
Thanks Peter, I've installed the patch now, and can confirm that it appears to work OK with my old HP 9310i. I suppose I should update my hint at LinuxFromScratch, I'll see if there is time over the holidays. Best wishes. Richard. -- Richard A Downing FBCS http://www.freewebs.com/109bean/ Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my address from this message or its header, you agree to these terms. -- Richard A Downing FBCS http://www.freewebs.com/109bean/ Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my address from this message or its header, you agree to these terms.
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Peter Osterlund wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Richard A Downing FBCS wrote:
I was about to update my kernel to the new stable 2.6.0, but notice Jens has added some changes since test11. Is there any reason to suppost the test11 patch wouldn't work?
No, the test11 patch should work just as well with 2.6.0 as it did with 2.6.0-test11. That doesn't necessarily mean it will work on either kernel unfortunately. See:
http://lists.suse.com/archive/packet-writing/2003-Dec/0009.html
I have created a new patch that hopefully fixes this problem. (At least it does for my Acer USB drive.) http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340/patches/packet/2.6/packet-2.6.1-rc1.patch... -- Peter Osterlund - petero2@telia.com http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340
How do I determine the version or revision of ptkcdvd,cdrwtool,ptksetup seperate from the ver of udftools.??? mike __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com
participants (5)
-
Frédéric L. W. Meunier -
gm c -
Peter Osterlund -
Richard A Downing FBCS -
Richard A Downing FBCS