Leap 15.3 glibc binary and source rpms are different versions
The x86_64 binary rpm is glibc-2.31-7.30.x86_64.rpm. The source rpm is glibc-2.31-7.20.src.rpm. Is there a source rpm corresponding to the binary that can be put in the source repo? Lynn Winebarger
On Samstag, 26. Juni 2021, 04:08:44 CEST Onnie Winebarger wrote:
The x86_64 binary rpm is glibc-2.31-7.30.x86_64.rpm. The source rpm is glibc-2.31-7.20.src.rpm. Is there a source rpm corresponding to the binary that can be put in the source repo?
hm, you are right, there is a missmatch which should not be there. However, the difference is just the rebuild counter. So the source of the 7.20 is also used for building 7.30 . So it is the matching source for the binary rpms. I will have look why this happened anyway ... -- Adrian Schroeter <adrian@suse.de> Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer ,
On Montag, 28. Juni 2021, 08:34:28 CEST Adrian Schröter wrote:
On Samstag, 26. Juni 2021, 04:08:44 CEST Onnie Winebarger wrote:
The x86_64 binary rpm is glibc-2.31-7.30.x86_64.rpm. The source rpm is glibc-2.31-7.20.src.rpm. Is there a source rpm corresponding to the binary that can be put in the source repo?
hm, you are right, there is a missmatch which should not be there.
However, the difference is just the rebuild counter. So the source of the 7.20 is also used for building 7.30 . So it is the matching source for the binary rpms.
I will have look why this happened anyway ...
Just for the record, this is the fix, but we will need to build new products to solve it in the ftp tree: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Maintenance:16619/product-b... bye adrian -- Adrian Schroeter <adrian@suse.de> Build Infrastructure Project Manager SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany (HRB 247165, AG München), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
participants (2)
-
Adrian Schröter -
Onnie Winebarger