On 2/25/21 10:54 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:

Am 2021-02-25 13:07, schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:

...

Hi Mathias!

On 2/25/21 1:05 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:

...

I'm tripping over an "Invalid license" error with some python packages...

[   57s] python-backports.csv.src: E: invalid-license (Badness: 100000) PSF-2.0 [   57s] python2-backports.csv.noarch: E: invalid-license (Badness: 100000) PSF-2.0 [   57s] python3-backports.csv.noarch: E: invalid-license (Badness: 100000) PSF-2.0 [   57s] The specified license string is not recognized. Please refer to [   57s] https://spdx.org/licenses/ for the list of known licenses and their exact [   57s] spelling.

The thing is, "PSF-2.0" is in fact listed in that list of valid licenses.

I assume that rpmlint in openSUSE uses this list [1] where PSF-2.0 is missing.

Adrian

...

[1] http://license.opensuse.org/

..then maybe rpmlint needs to have that bug fixed that makes it print out the wrong url to the list of licenses...?

Maybe, at a guess it just hasn't been patched to use our list rather then the upstream one.

At the same time it might be worth a bug for SUSE legal to add a mapping to our list for "PSF-2.0"

On Fri, 2021-02-26 at 07:46 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:

Am 26.02.21 um 00:51 schrieb Simon Lees:

...

At the same time it might be worth a bug for SUSE legal to add a mapping to our list for "PSF-2.0"

license.opensuse.org is an old page (and I thought Darix was handling to point it to where it fits). The README contains our latest list [even though it's not yet landed in Tumbleweed]: https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file

sad story - but you know it already: the SR for format-spec-file removes the legacy LICENSE+ writing style (in favor of -or-later), which is ok. But this list is then consumed by rpmlint, and license fails are a hard fail for Factory; so we get a ton of failures (the attempt to make *LICENSE+ valid was not correct, and never corrected since)

So I see two ways out: * Fix rpmlint to get the license list correctly spun up based on the shortened list in format-spec * re-add the LICENSE+ spelling in format-spec (and revert the broken fix-attempt in rpmlint)

Cheers, Dominique

On Fri, 2021-02-26 at 11:51 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:

There was a slight misunderstanding about who would care about this, but let's fix this: created request id 875331

Thanks - that should then unblock this issue.

Cheers, Dominique

Am 26.02.21 um 20:20 schrieb Christian Boltz:

Hello,

Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2021, 07:46:15 CET schrieb Stephan Kulow:

...

license.opensuse.org is an old page (and I thought Darix was handling to point it to where it fits). The README contains our latest list [even though it's not yet landed in Tumbleweed]: https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file

So you are saying that license.opensuse.org should redirect to https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file/blob/master/ README.md instead of the current google doc document?

Please confirm (bonus points if you CC admin@o.o), and I'll get the redirect updated.

Hi Christian,

The spreadsheet currently linked there is just the mapping from pre-SPDX format to SPDX - all the upstream SPDX is not in.

https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file/blob/master/README.... is indeed the more complete table.

Greetings, Stephan

Am 25.02.21 um 13:07 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:

I assume that rpmlint in openSUSE uses this list [1] where PSF-2.0 is missing.

Adrian

...

[1] http://license.opensuse.org/

Any idea how to get something added there? I've opened bug 1152572 a long time ago to get the LLVM-exception recognized by rpmlint, but that went nowhere. Maybe it wasn't the right approach.

I also filed a bug for the SUSE legal team earlier (1144953, these are not public), but that was also ignored. It doesn't block me, but it's a bit annoying perhaps.

Best regards, Aaron