25 Feb
2021
25 Feb
'21
13:05
Hi,
I'm tripping over an "Invalid license" error with some python
packages...
[ 57s] python-backports.csv.src: E: invalid-license (Badness: 100000)
PSF-2.0
[ 57s] python2-backports.csv.noarch: E: invalid-license (Badness:
100000) PSF-2.0
[ 57s] python3-backports.csv.noarch: E: invalid-license (Badness:
100000) PSF-2.0
[ 57s] The specified license string is not recognized. Please refer to
[ 57s] https://spdx.org/licenses/ for the list of known licenses and
their exact
[ 57s] spelling.
The thing is, "PSF-2.0" is in fact listed in that list of valid
licenses.
What can I do?
Cheers
MH
--
Mathias Homann
Mathias.Homann(a)openSUSE.org
telegram: https://telegram.me/lemmy98
irc: [lemmy] on freenode and ircnet
obs: lemmy04
gpg key fingerprint: 8029 2240 F4DD 7776 E7D2 C042 6B8E 029E 13F2 C102
25 Feb
25 Feb
13:07
Hi Mathias!
On 2/25/21 1:05 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
I'm tripping over an "Invalid license"
error with some python packages...
[ 57s] python-backports.csv.src: E: invalid-license (Badness: 100000) PSF-2.0
[ 57s] python2-backports.csv.noarch: E: invalid-license (Badness: 100000) PSF-2.0
[ 57s] python3-backports.csv.noarch: E: invalid-license (Badness: 100000) PSF-2.0
[ 57s] The specified license string is not recognized. Please refer to
[ 57s] https://spdx.org/licenses/ for the list of known licenses and their exact
[ 57s] spelling.
The thing is, "PSF-2.0" is in fact listed in that list of valid licenses.
I assume that rpmlint in openSUSE uses this list [1] where PSF-2.0 is missing.
Adrian
> [1] http://license.opensuse.org/
13:24
Am 2021-02-25 13:07, schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
Hi Mathias!
On 2/25/21 1:05 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
..then maybe rpmlint needs to have that bug fixed that makes it print
out the wrong url to the list of licenses...?
Cheers
Mathias
--
Mathias Homann
Mathias.Homann(a)openSUSE.org
telegram: https://telegram.me/lemmy98
irc: [lemmy] on freenode and ircnet
obs: lemmy04
gpg key fingerprint: 8029 2240 F4DD 7776 E7D2 C042 6B8E 029E 13F2 C102
I'm tripping over an "Invalid
license" error with some python
packages...
[ 57s] python-backports.csv.src: E: invalid-license (Badness:
100000) PSF-2.0
[ 57s] python2-backports.csv.noarch: E: invalid-license (Badness:
100000) PSF-2.0
[ 57s] python3-backports.csv.noarch: E: invalid-license (Badness:
100000) PSF-2.0
[ 57s] The specified license string is not recognized. Please refer
to
[ 57s] https://spdx.org/licenses/ for the list of known licenses and
their exact
[ 57s] spelling.
The thing is, "PSF-2.0" is in fact listed in that list of valid
licenses.
I assume that rpmlint in openSUSE uses this list [1] where PSF-2.0 is
missing.
Adrian
> [1] http://license.opensuse.org/ 
26 Feb
26 Feb
00:51
On 2/25/21 10:54 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
Am 2021-02-25 13:07, schrieb John Paul Adrian
Glaubitz:
Maybe, at a guess it just hasn't been patched to use our list rather
then the upstream one.
At the same time it might be worth a bug for SUSE legal to add a mapping
to our list for "PSF-2.0"
--
Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net
Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek
SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30
GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
Hi Mathias!
On 2/25/21 1:05 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
..then maybe rpmlint needs to have that bug fixed that makes it print
out the wrong url to the list of licenses...? I'm tripping over an "Invalid
license" error with some python
packages...
[ 57s] python-backports.csv.src: E: invalid-license (Badness:
100000) PSF-2.0
[ 57s] python2-backports.csv.noarch: E: invalid-license (Badness:
100000) PSF-2.0
[ 57s] python3-backports.csv.noarch: E: invalid-license (Badness:
100000) PSF-2.0
[ 57s] The specified license string is not recognized. Please refer to
[ 57s] https://spdx.org/licenses/ for the list of known licenses
and their exact
[ 57s] spelling.
The thing is, "PSF-2.0" is in fact listed in that list of valid
licenses.
I assume that rpmlint in openSUSE uses this list [1] where PSF-2.0 is
missing.
Adrian
> [1] http://license.opensuse.org/ 
07:46
Am 26.02.21 um 00:51 schrieb Simon Lees:
At the same time it might be worth a bug for SUSE legal to add a mapping
to our list for "PSF-2.0"
license.opensuse.org is an old page (and I thought Darix was handling to point it
to where it fits). The README contains our latest list [even though it's not yet
landed in Tumbleweed]: https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file
rpmlint gets it from there - and PSF is part of it. We just need to get this into
Factory.
Greetings, Stephan
--
Lighten up, just enjoy life, smile more, laugh more, and
don't get so worked up about things.
Kenneth Branagh
09:44
On Fri, 2021-02-26 at 07:46 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 26.02.21 um 00:51 schrieb Simon Lees:
sad story - but you know it already:
the SR for format-spec-file removes the legacy LICENSE+ writing style
(in favor of -or-later), which is ok. But this list is then consumed by
rpmlint, and license fails are a hard fail for Factory; so we get a ton
of failures (the attempt to make *LICENSE+ valid was not correct, and
never corrected since)
So I see two ways out:
* Fix rpmlint to get the license list correctly spun up based on the
shortened list in format-spec
* re-add the LICENSE+ spelling in format-spec (and revert the broken
fix-attempt in rpmlint)
Cheers,
Dominique
At the same time it might be worth a bug for SUSE legal to add a mapping
to our list for "PSF-2.0"
license.opensuse.org is an old page (and I thought Darix was handling to point
it
to where it fits). The README contains our latest list [even though it's not yet
landed in Tumbleweed]: https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file
11:51
Am 26.02.21 um 09:44 schrieb Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar:
So I see two ways out:
* Fix rpmlint to get the license list correctly spun up based on the
shortened list in format-spec
There was a slight misunderstanding about who would care about this,
but let's fix this:
created request id 875331
Greetings, Stephan
--
Lighten up, just enjoy life, smile more, laugh more, and
don't get so worked up about things.
Kenneth Branagh
20:20
Hello,
Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2021, 07:46:15 CET schrieb Stephan Kulow:
license.opensuse.org is an old page (and I thought
Darix was handling
to point it to where it fits). The README contains our latest list
[even though it's not yet landed in Tumbleweed]:
https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file
So you are saying that license.opensuse.org should redirect to
https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file/blob/master/
README.md instead of the current google doc document?
Please confirm (bonus points if you CC admin(a)o.o), and I'll get the
redirect updated.
Regards,
Christian Boltz
--
Auch meinen Namen aus der Liste streichen...
Wollen wir mal darueber abstimmen, ob es fuer Linux von Vorteil war,
von einem Produkt der Verstaendigen zum Produkt fuer den Massenkonsum
zu werden? (-; [Bodo Kaelberer in suse-security]
21:30
Am 26.02.21 um 20:20 schrieb Christian Boltz:
Hello,
Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2021, 07:46:15 CET schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Hi Christian,
The spreadsheet currently linked there is just the mapping from pre-SPDX
format to SPDX - all the upstream SPDX is not in.
https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file/blob/master/README…
is indeed the more complete table.
Greetings, Stephan
--
Lighten up, just enjoy life, smile more, laugh more, and
don't get so worked up about things.
Kenneth Branagh
license.opensuse.org is an old page (and I
thought Darix was handling
to point it to where it fits). The README contains our latest list
[even though it's not yet landed in Tumbleweed]:
https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file
So you are saying that license.opensuse.org should redirect to
https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file/blob/master/
README.md instead of the current google doc document?
Please confirm (bonus points if you CC admin(a)o.o), and I'll get the
redirect updated.
28 Feb
28 Feb
14:12
Hello,
Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2021, 21:30:34 CET schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Am 26.02.21 um 20:20 schrieb Christian Boltz:
OK, license.o.o redirect updated.
Regards,
Christian Boltz
--
Looks like if the bios tried to boot the mouse... stupid cat :-))
[jdd in opensuse-testing]
Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2021, 07:46:15 CET
schrieb Stephan Kulow:
The spreadsheet currently linked there is just the mapping from
pre-SPDX format to SPDX - all the upstream SPDX is not in.
https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file/blob/master/R
EADME.md is indeed the more complete table. license.opensuse.org is an old page (and I
thought Darix was
handling
to point it to where it fits). The README contains our latest list
[even though it's not yet landed in Tumbleweed]:
https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file
So you are saying that license.opensuse.org should redirect to
https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file/blob/master
/README.md instead of the current google doc document?
Please confirm (bonus points if you CC admin(a)o.o), and I'll get the
redirect updated. 
26 Feb
26 Feb
00:46
Am 25.02.21 um 13:07 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
I assume that rpmlint in openSUSE uses this list [1]
where PSF-2.0 is missing.
Adrian
> [1] http://license.opensuse.org/
Any idea how to get something added there? I've opened bug 1152572 a
long time ago to get the LLVM-exception recognized by rpmlint, but that
went nowhere. Maybe it wasn't the right approach.
I also filed a bug for the SUSE legal team earlier (1144953, these are
not public), but that was also ignored. It doesn't block me, but it's a
bit annoying perhaps.
Best regards,
Aaron
50
days inactive
53
days old
11 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Aaron Puchert -
Christian Boltz -
Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar -
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz -
Mathias Homann -
Simon Lees -
Stephan Kulow