Packaging python: "Invalid license" even though the license is listed on
Hi, I'm tripping over an "Invalid license" error with some python packages... [ 57s] python-backports.csv.src: E: invalid-license (Badness: 100000) PSF-2.0 [ 57s] python2-backports.csv.noarch: E: invalid-license (Badness: 100000) PSF-2.0 [ 57s] python3-backports.csv.noarch: E: invalid-license (Badness: 100000) PSF-2.0 [ 57s] The specified license string is not recognized. Please refer to [ 57s] https://spdx.org/licenses/ for the list of known licenses and their exact [ 57s] spelling. The thing is, "PSF-2.0" is in fact listed in that list of valid licenses. What can I do? Cheers MH -- Mathias Homann Mathias.Homann@openSUSE.org telegram: https://telegram.me/lemmy98 irc: [lemmy] on freenode and ircnet obs: lemmy04 gpg key fingerprint: 8029 2240 F4DD 7776 E7D2 C042 6B8E 029E 13F2 C102
Hi Mathias! On 2/25/21 1:05 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
I assume that rpmlint in openSUSE uses this list [1] where PSF-2.0 is missing. Adrian
Am 2021-02-25 13:07, schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
..then maybe rpmlint needs to have that bug fixed that makes it print out the wrong url to the list of licenses...? Cheers Mathias -- Mathias Homann Mathias.Homann@openSUSE.org telegram: https://telegram.me/lemmy98 irc: [lemmy] on freenode and ircnet obs: lemmy04 gpg key fingerprint: 8029 2240 F4DD 7776 E7D2 C042 6B8E 029E 13F2 C102
On 2/25/21 10:54 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
Maybe, at a guess it just hasn't been patched to use our list rather then the upstream one. At the same time it might be worth a bug for SUSE legal to add a mapping to our list for "PSF-2.0" -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
Am 26.02.21 um 00:51 schrieb Simon Lees:
At the same time it might be worth a bug for SUSE legal to add a mapping to our list for "PSF-2.0"
license.opensuse.org is an old page (and I thought Darix was handling to point it to where it fits). The README contains our latest list [even though it's not yet landed in Tumbleweed]: https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file rpmlint gets it from there - and PSF is part of it. We just need to get this into Factory. Greetings, Stephan -- Lighten up, just enjoy life, smile more, laugh more, and don't get so worked up about things. Kenneth Branagh
On Fri, 2021-02-26 at 07:46 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
sad story - but you know it already: the SR for format-spec-file removes the legacy LICENSE+ writing style (in favor of -or-later), which is ok. But this list is then consumed by rpmlint, and license fails are a hard fail for Factory; so we get a ton of failures (the attempt to make *LICENSE+ valid was not correct, and never corrected since) So I see two ways out: * Fix rpmlint to get the license list correctly spun up based on the shortened list in format-spec * re-add the LICENSE+ spelling in format-spec (and revert the broken fix-attempt in rpmlint) Cheers, Dominique
Am 26.02.21 um 09:44 schrieb Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar:
There was a slight misunderstanding about who would care about this, but let's fix this: created request id 875331 Greetings, Stephan -- Lighten up, just enjoy life, smile more, laugh more, and don't get so worked up about things. Kenneth Branagh
Hello, Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2021, 07:46:15 CET schrieb Stephan Kulow:
So you are saying that license.opensuse.org should redirect to https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file/blob/master/ README.md instead of the current google doc document? Please confirm (bonus points if you CC admin@o.o), and I'll get the redirect updated. Regards, Christian Boltz --
Am 26.02.21 um 20:20 schrieb Christian Boltz:
Hi Christian, The spreadsheet currently linked there is just the mapping from pre-SPDX format to SPDX - all the upstream SPDX is not in. https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file/blob/master/README.... is indeed the more complete table. Greetings, Stephan -- Lighten up, just enjoy life, smile more, laugh more, and don't get so worked up about things. Kenneth Branagh
Am 25.02.21 um 13:07 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
Any idea how to get something added there? I've opened bug 1152572 a long time ago to get the LLVM-exception recognized by rpmlint, but that went nowhere. Maybe it wasn't the right approach. I also filed a bug for the SUSE legal team earlier (1144953, these are not public), but that was also ignored. It doesn't block me, but it's a bit annoying perhaps. Best regards, Aaron
Hi Mathias! On 2/25/21 1:05 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
I assume that rpmlint in openSUSE uses this list [1] where PSF-2.0 is missing. Adrian
Am 2021-02-25 13:07, schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
..then maybe rpmlint needs to have that bug fixed that makes it print out the wrong url to the list of licenses...? Cheers Mathias -- Mathias Homann Mathias.Homann@openSUSE.org telegram: https://telegram.me/lemmy98 irc: [lemmy] on freenode and ircnet obs: lemmy04 gpg key fingerprint: 8029 2240 F4DD 7776 E7D2 C042 6B8E 029E 13F2 C102
On 2/25/21 10:54 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
Maybe, at a guess it just hasn't been patched to use our list rather then the upstream one. At the same time it might be worth a bug for SUSE legal to add a mapping to our list for "PSF-2.0" -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
Am 26.02.21 um 00:51 schrieb Simon Lees:
At the same time it might be worth a bug for SUSE legal to add a mapping to our list for "PSF-2.0"
license.opensuse.org is an old page (and I thought Darix was handling to point it to where it fits). The README contains our latest list [even though it's not yet landed in Tumbleweed]: https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-format_spec_file rpmlint gets it from there - and PSF is part of it. We just need to get this into Factory. Greetings, Stephan -- Lighten up, just enjoy life, smile more, laugh more, and don't get so worked up about things. Kenneth Branagh
On Fri, 2021-02-26 at 07:46 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
sad story - but you know it already: the SR for format-spec-file removes the legacy LICENSE+ writing style (in favor of -or-later), which is ok. But this list is then consumed by rpmlint, and license fails are a hard fail for Factory; so we get a ton of failures (the attempt to make *LICENSE+ valid was not correct, and never corrected since) So I see two ways out: * Fix rpmlint to get the license list correctly spun up based on the shortened list in format-spec * re-add the LICENSE+ spelling in format-spec (and revert the broken fix-attempt in rpmlint) Cheers, Dominique
Am 26.02.21 um 09:44 schrieb Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar:
There was a slight misunderstanding about who would care about this, but let's fix this: created request id 875331 Greetings, Stephan -- Lighten up, just enjoy life, smile more, laugh more, and don't get so worked up about things. Kenneth Branagh
participants (7)
-
Aaron Puchert -
Christian Boltz -
Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar -
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz -
Mathias Homann -
Simon Lees -
Stephan Kulow