Hi There is a package on the OBS Contrib nautilus-image-converter the current packages push the libnautilus-image-converter.so into %{_libdir}/nautilus/extensions-1.0 but this doesn't work, if I use %{_libdir}/nautilus/extensions-2.0 in the Makefile it functions as expected.
Is this an acceptable method of patching? If so I will submit the patch.
Le mardi 25 mai 2010, à 14:19 -0500, Malcolm a écrit :
Hi There is a package on the OBS Contrib nautilus-image-converter the current packages push the libnautilus-image-converter.so into %{_libdir}/nautilus/extensions-1.0 but this doesn't work, if I use %{_libdir}/nautilus/extensions-2.0 in the Makefile it functions as expected.
Is this an acceptable method of patching? If so I will submit the patch.
The right thing to do is to patch configure.in/configure.ac to use this call to determine where to install the file:
pkg-config --variable=extensiondir libnautilus-extension
You can look at the configure.in from totem for an example.
Vincent
El 25/05/10 15:19, Malcolm escribió:
Is this an acceptable method of patching? If so I will submit the patch.
see submit request 40645.
That should suffice fine until nautilus provides proper rpm macros AND an plugin API/ABI version macro.
cheers.
On Tue, 25 May 2010 15:54:37 -0400 Cristian Rodríguez crrodriguez@opensuse.org wrote:
El 25/05/10 15:19, Malcolm escribió:
Is this an acceptable method of patching? If so I will submit the patch.
see submit request 40645.
That should suffice fine until nautilus provides proper rpm macros AND an plugin API/ABI version macro.
cheers.
Hi Pardon my ignorance :( how does one see "submit request 40645"?
El 25/05/10 16:48, Malcolm escribió:
Hi Pardon my ignorance :( how does one see "submit request 40645"?
too see it
osc rq show --diff 40645
to accept it
osc rq accept 40645
;)
-
Cristian Rodríguez -
Malcolm -
Vincent Untz