Kyrill Detinov Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:10:58 +0300:

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:17:50 +0300 Dmitriy Perlow wrote:

...

Recently I've decided to play xmahjongg and surprised that I had failed to find out it in repos. So I made and submited it to games. When I opened a request to Factory, coolo answered that we already had xmahjong (not xmahjongg). I suggest to delete xmahjong and submit xmahjongg, that would provide and obsolete xmahjong :)

Do I hear any objections?

Keep both. They are different games.

They provide the binary with identical name. As I found:

xmahjongg version 3 is a complete rewrite by Eddie Kohler of xmahjongg versions 1 and 2 by Jeff S. Young. So should we really provide both of them? If so I would add a Conflicts tag.

-- Dmitriy DA(P).DarkneSS Perlow / Linux x64 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org

On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 07:30:59 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote:

...

...

Keep both. They are different games.

Not really.

...

They provide the binary with identical name. As I found:

...

xmahjongg version 3 is a complete rewrite by Eddie Kohler of xmahjongg versions 1 and 2 by Jeff S. Young. So should we really provide both of them? If so I would add a Conflicts tag.

IMO just Obsolete xmahjong.

1:1 Ask Werner Fink. He is the maintainer of xmahjong packages. -- WBR Kyrill