[opensuse-packaging] games|Factory/xmahjong(g) package
Hello. Recently I've decided to play xmahjongg and surprised that I had failed to find out it in repos. So I made and submited it to games. When I opened a request to Factory, coolo answered that we already had xmahjong (not xmahjongg). I suggest to delete xmahjong and submit xmahjongg, that would provide and obsolete xmahjong :) Do I hear any objections? -- Dmitriy DA(P).DarkneSS Perlow / Linux x64 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:17:50 +0300 Dmitriy Perlow wrote:
Recently I've decided to play xmahjongg and surprised that I had failed to find out it in repos. So I made and submited it to games. When I opened a request to Factory, coolo answered that we already had xmahjong (not xmahjongg). I suggest to delete xmahjong and submit xmahjongg, that would provide and obsolete xmahjong :)
Do I hear any objections?
Keep both. They are different games. -- WBR Kyrill
Kyrill Detinov <lazy.kent@opensuse.org> Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:10:58 +0300:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:17:50 +0300 Dmitriy Perlow wrote:
Recently I've decided to play xmahjongg and surprised that I had failed to find out it in repos. So I made and submited it to games. When I opened a request to Factory, coolo answered that we already had xmahjong (not xmahjongg). I suggest to delete xmahjong and submit xmahjongg, that would provide and obsolete xmahjong :)
Do I hear any objections?
Keep both. They are different games.
They provide the binary with identical name. As I found:
xmahjongg version 3 is a complete rewrite by Eddie Kohler of xmahjongg versions 1 and 2 by Jeff S. Young. So should we really provide both of them? If so I would add a Conflicts tag.
-- Dmitriy DA(P).DarkneSS Perlow / Linux x64 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
On Monday 2013-07-01 06:02, Dmitriy Perlow wrote:
Kyrill Detinov <lazy.kent@opensuse.org> Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:10:58 +0300:
xmahjongg, that would provide and obsolete xmahjong :)
Do I hear any objections?
Keep both. They are different games.
Not really.
They provide the binary with identical name. As I found:
xmahjongg version 3 is a complete rewrite by Eddie Kohler of xmahjongg versions 1 and 2 by Jeff S. Young. So should we really provide both of them? If so I would add a Conflicts tag.
IMO just Obsolete xmahjong. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 07:30:59 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Keep both. They are different games.
Not really.
They provide the binary with identical name. As I found:
xmahjongg version 3 is a complete rewrite by Eddie Kohler of xmahjongg versions 1 and 2 by Jeff S. Young. So should we really provide both of them? If so I would add a Conflicts tag.
IMO just Obsolete xmahjong.
1:1 Ask Werner Fink. He is the maintainer of xmahjong packages. -- WBR Kyrill
participants (4)
-
Dmitriy Perlow -
Dmitriy Perlow -
Jan Engelhardt -
Kyrill Detinov