On Thursday, July 22, 2010 10:57:51 am oc2pus(a)arcor.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010 schrieb Michal Šebeň:
> in packman repo tuxguitar depends on eclipse-swt-gtk2 package (packman
> doesn't contain eclipse package itself) :
> but there is a problem here : I checked source rpm-file of
> eclipse-swt-gtk2 and I am not sure if we could use this package in our
> obs, it contains already prepared native libraries ... (but I am not
> java packager)
this package contains the java and native libraries for the swt part of
and the native libraires are compiled against the actual xulrunner
This package is also needed for several ther packman packages
> Michal ? what do you think, could we use eclipse-swt-gtk2 in obs ?
I'd prefer to not maintain any part of eclipse :) And swt tends to have dozens
of strange gtk related bugs I don't want to deal with, sorry Michal.
Looking on Packman package the biggest problem is - it is much more older swt
version than we distributed until now (gtk issues, remember?). And it's not
built from source, it uses the swt.jar, which is still not serious, but
maintenance of binary only Java program is still nothing nice. Maybe the most
doable way would be use existing eclipse.spec, update sources to 3.6 and then
install swt only ...
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Vincent Untz <vuntz(a)opensuse.org> wrote:
> > Le mercredi 21 juillet 2010, à 16:03 +0200, Michal Šebeň a écrit :
> >> I created deleterequest, tuxguitar is also in packman repo, so I hope
> >> it won't hurt so much
> > Won't the version in packman have the same issue? Or if it doesn't,
> > then it means there's eclipse there too -- in which case, we should
> > most probably ask the packman people responsible for eclipse and
> > tuxguitar to maintain those packages in the build service instead,
> > shouldn't we?
> > Vincent
> > --
> > Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org